US Long-Term Ecological Research Network

North Temperate Lakes LTER: Physical and Chemical Limnology of Lake Kegonsa and Lake Waubesa 1994 - current

Abstract
Physical and chemicals parameters of two Madison-area lakes in the Yahara chain not included as core NTL-LTER study lakes. Parameters include intermittently sampled water temperature, dissolved oxygen, ph, total alkalinity, chloride and sulfate. Nutrient data has been collected since 2015. Number of sites: 2.
Dataset ID
401
Date Range
-
DOI
10.6073/pasta/cc6f0e4d317d29200234c7243471472a
Maintenance
ongoing
Metadata Provider
Short Name
NTLCH01
Version Number
1

WDNR Yahara Lakes Fisheries: Fish Lengths and Weights 1987-1998

Abstract
These data were collected by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) from 1987-1998. Most of these data (1987-1993) precede 1995, the year that the University of Wisconsin NTL-LTER program took over sampling of the Yahara Lakes. However, WDNR data collected from 1997-1998 (unrelated to LTER sampling) is also included. In 1987 a joint project by the WDNR and the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center for Limnology (CFL) was initiated on Lake Mendota. The project involved biomanipulation of fish communities within the lake, which was acheived by stocking game fish species (northern pike and walleye). The goal was to induce a trophic cascade that would improve the water clarity of Lake Mendota. See Lathrop et al. 2002. Stocking piscivores to improve fishing and water clarity: a synthesis of the Lake Mendota biomanipulation project. Freshwater Biology 47, 2410-2424. In collecting these data, the objective was to gather population data and monitor populations to track the progress of the biomanipulation. The data is dominated by an assesssment of the game fishery in Lake Mendota, however other Yahara Lakes and non-game fish species are also represented. A combination of gear types was used to gather the population data including boom shocking, fyke netting, mini-fyke netting, seining, and gill netting. Not every sampling year includes length and weight data from all gear types. The WDNR also carried out randomized, access-point creel surveys to estimate fishing pressure, catch rates, harvest, and exploitation rates. Five data files each include length-weight data, and are organized by the type of gear or method which was used to collect the data: 1) fyke, mini-fyke, and seine netting 2) boom shocking 3) gill netting (1993 only) 4)walleye age as determined by scale and spine analysis (1987 only), and 5) creel survey. The final data file contains creel survey information: number of anglers fishing the shoreline, and number of anglers that started and completed trips from public and private access points.
Core Areas
Dataset ID
279
Date Range
-
Metadata Provider
Methods
BOOM SHOCKING1987:A standard WDNR electrofishing boat was used on Lake Mendota set at 300 volts and 2.5 amps (mean) DC, with a 20 % duty cycle and 60 pulses per second. On all sampling dates two people netted fish, the total electrofishing crew was three people. Shocking was divided into stations. For each station, the actual starting and ending time was recorded. Starting and ending points of each station were plotted on a nap. A 7.5 minute topographic map (published 1983) and a cartometer was used to develop a standardized shoreline mileage numbering scheme. Starting at the Yahara River outlet at Tenney Park and measuring counterclockwise, the shoreline was numbered according to the number of miles from the outlet. The length of shoreline shocked for each station was determined using the same maps. The objectives of the fall 1987 electrofishing was: to gather CPE data for comparison with previous surveys of the lake; develop a database for relating fall electroshocker CPE to predator density; collect fall predator diet data; make mark-recapture population estimates of YOY predators; and determine year-class-strength of some nonpredators (yellow perch, yellow bass, and white bass).1993: Electrofishing was used to continue marking largemouth and smallmouth bass (because of low CPE in fyke nets), to recapture fish marked in fyke netting, and to mark and recapture walleyes ( less than 11.0 in.) on Lake Mendota. Four person crews electrofished after sunset from May 05 to June 03, 1993. A standard WDNR electrofishing boat was used, set at about 300 volts and 15.0 amps (mean) DC, with a 20 % duty cycle at 60 pulses per second. On all sampling dates two people netted fish; thus, CPE data are given as catch per two netter hour or mile. Shocking was divided into stations. For each station the actual starting and ending time and the generator s meter times was recorded. Starting and ending points of each station were plotted on a map. 7.5 minute topographic maps (published in 1983) were used in addition to a cartometer to develop a standardized shoreline mileage numbering scheme. Starting at the Yahara River outlet at Tenney Park and measuring counterclockwise the shoreline was numbered according to the number of miles from the outlet. The length of shoreline shocked for each station was determined using these maps. The 4 person electroshocker crews were used again from September 20 to October 19. Fall shocking had several objectives: to gather CPE data for comparison with previous surveys of the lake; develop a database for relating fall electroshocker CPE to piscivore density; and make mark recapture population estimates of young of year (YOY) piscivores.1997:5/13/1997-5/20/1997: Electrofishing was completed at night on lakes: Mendota, Monona, and Waubesa. A standard WDNR electrofishing boat was used, set from 320-420 volts and 16-22 amps DC, with a 20 % duty cycle at 50 pulses per second. Two netters were used for each shocking event. At a particular station, starting and ending times where shocking took place were recorded. The location of the designated shocking stations is unknown.9/23/1997-10/14/1997: Electrofishing was completed at night on Mendota, Monona, Waubesa, and Wingra. A standard WDNR electrofishing boat was used, set from 315-400 volts and 16-24 amps DC, with a 20% duty cycle at 60 pulses per second. Two netters were used for each shocking event. Starting and ending time at each shocking station was listed. The location of the designated shocking stations is unknown.1998:Electrofishing was completed at night on Mendota, Monona, Wingra, and Waubesa from 5/12/1998- 10/28/1998. A standard WDNR electrofishing boat was used, set from 240-410 volts and 15-22 amps DC, with a 20% duty cycle at 50-100 pulses per second. Two netters were used for each shocking event. Starting and ending time at each shocking station was listed. The location of the designated shocking stations is unknown. FYKE NETTING1987:Fyke nets were fished daily from March 17 to April 24, 1987 on Lake Mendota. The nets were constructed of 1.25 inch (stretch) mesh with a lead length of 50 ft. (a few 25 ft. leads were used). The hoop diameter was 3 ft. and the frame measured 3 ft. by 6 ft. Total length of the net was 28 ft. plus the lead length. Nets were set in 48 unknown locations. Initially, effort was concentrated around traditional northern pike spawning sites (Cherokee Marsh, Sixmile Creek, Pheasant Branch Creek, and University Bay). As northern pike catch-per-effort (CPE) declined some nets were moved onto rocky shorelines of the lake to capture walleyes. All adult predators (northern pike, hybrid muskie, largemouth and smallmouth bass, walleye, gar, bowfin, and channel catfish) captured were tagged and scale sampled. Measurements on non-predator species captured in fyke nets were made one day per week. This sampling was used to index size structure and abundance, and to collect age and growth data. In each net, total length and weight of 20 fish of each species caught was measured, and the remaining caught were counted.1993:Same methods as 1987, except fyke nets were fished from 4/8/1993-4/29/1993 on Lake Mendota. The 1993 fyke net data also specifies the &ldquo;mile&rdquo; at which the fyke net was set. This is defined as the number of miles from the outlet of the Yahara River at Tenney Park, moving counterclockwise around the lake. In addition, abundance and lengths of non-gamefish species captured in fyke nets were recorded one day per week. Six nets were randomly selected to sample for non-gamefish data. This sampling was used to index size structure and abundance, and to collect age and growth data. In each randomly selected net, total length and weight was measured for 20 fish of each species, and the remaining caught were counted.1998:There is no formal documentation for the exact methods used for fyke netting from 3/3/1998-8/12/1998 on Lake Mendota. However, given that the data is similar to data collected in 1987 and 1993 it is speculated that the same methods were used.MINI-FYKE NETTING1989:There is no formal documentation for the exact methods used for mini-fyke netting on Lake Mendota and Lake Monona from 7/26/1989-8/25/1989. However, given that the data is similar to data collected from 1990-1993 it is speculated that the same methods were used. In the sampling year of 1989, mini-fyke nets were placed at 22 different unknown stations.1990-1993: Mini-fyke nets were fished on Lake Mendota and Lake Monona during July-September at 20, 29, 13, and 15 sites per month during 1990, 1991, 1992, and 1993, respectively to estimate year-class strength, relative abundance, and size structure of fishes in the littoral zone. Nets were constructed with 3/16 in. mesh, 2 ft. diameter hoops, 2 ft. x 3 ft. frame, and a 25 ft. lead. Sites were comparable to seine sites used in previous surveys. Sites included a variety of substrate types and macrophyte densities. To exclude turtles and large piscivores from minifyke nets, some nets were constructed with approximately 2 in. by 2 in. mesh at the entrance to the net. Thus, mini-fyke net data are most accurate for YOY fishes, and should not be used to make inferences about fishes larger than the exclusion mesh size. 1997:There is no formal documentation for the mini-fyke methods which were used on Lake Waubesa and Lake Wingra from 9/16/1997-9/18/1997. However, given that the data is similar to data collected in 1989, and 1990-1993, it is speculated that the methods used during 1997 are the same. SEINE NETTING1989, 1993: Monthly shoreline seining surveys were conducted on Lake Mendota and Lake Monona during June through September to estimate year class-strength, relative abundance, and size structure of the littoral zone fish community. Twenty sites were identified based on previous studies. Sites included a variety of substrate types and macrophyte densities. Seine hauls were made with a 25ft bag seine with 1/8 inch mesh pulled perpendicular to shore starting from a depth of 1 m. Twenty fish of each species were measured from each haul and any additional fish were counted. Gill Netting (1993)Experimental gill nets were fished in weekly periods during June through August, 1993. Gill nets were used to capture piscivores for population estimates of fish marked in fyke nets. All nets were constructed of five 2.5-4.5 in. mesh panels, and were 125 ft. long. Nets set in water shallower than 10 ft. were 3ft. high or less; all others were 6ft. high or less. Sampling locations were selected randomly from up to three strata: 1) offshore reef sets, 2) inshore sets, 6.0-9.9 ft. deep, and 3) mid-depth sets, 10-29.9 ft. deep. The exact location at which the gill nets were set on the lake is unknown because the latitude and longitude values which were recorded by the WDNR are invalid. Temperature and dissolved oxygen profiles were used to monitor the development of the thermocline and guide net placement during July and August. After the thermocline was established nets were set out to the 30 ft. contour or to the maximum depth with dissolved oxygen greater than 2 ppm. Walleye Age: Scale and Spine Analysis (1987) Scales were taken from walleye that were shocked during the fall of 1987 electrofishing events on Lake Mendota. Scales were taken from 10 fish per one-inch length increment. The scales were removed from behind the left pectoral fin, and from the nape on the left side on esocids. In addition, the second dorsal spine was removed from 10 walleyes per sex and inch increment (to age and compare with scale ages for fish over 20 inches). CREEL SURVEYS1989:Fishing pressure, catch rates, harvest, and exploitation rates were estimated from a randomized, access-point creel survey. The schedule was stratified into weekday and weekend/holiday day types. Shifts were selected randomly and were either 07:00-15:00 h or 15:00-23:00 h. In addition, two 23:00-03:00 h shifts and two 03:00-07:00 h shifts were sampled per month to estimate the same parameters during night time hours. During the ice fishing season (January-February) 22 access points around Lake Mendota and upstream to the Highway 113 bridge were sampled. The clerk counted the number of anglers starting and completing trips during the scheduled stop at each access point. During openwater (March-December) 13 access points were sampled; 10 were boat ramps and 3 were popular shore fishing sites<strong>. </strong>At each of these sites, an instantaneous count of shore anglers was made upon arrival at the site, continuous counts of anglers starting and completing trips at public and private access points were made. Boat occupants and ice fishing anglers were only interviewed if they were completing a trip. Both complete and incomplete interviews were made of shore anglers. Number caught and number kept of each species, and percent of time seeking a particular species were recorded. All predators possessed by anglers were measured, weighed, and inspected for finclips and tags. We measured a random sample of at least 20 fish of each non-predator species per day.1990-1993: Same as 1989, except 23 access points were used during the ice fishing season. In addition, 13 access points were sampled during the openwater (May-December) season; 9 sites were boat ramps and 4 sites were popular shore fishing sites. 1994-1999: No formal documentation exists, but given the similarity in the data and consistency through the years; it is speculated tha tthe methods are the same.
Version Number
19

Ice Phenology Workshop at Lake Erken, Sweden

Proposal

Ice Phenology Workshop: Comparing change in Scandinavia and the Great Lakes region

Long term observations of freeze and breakup dates for lakes and rivers across the northern hemisphere show consistent and widespread changes in ice phenology3. Recent analyses have focused on understanding geographic patterns in such changes4,5, and their consequences for aquatic communities6. Two regions of the world have a sufficient quantitiy of long term ice phenology records to allow for a detailed regional approach to understanding their patterns: the Laurentian Great Lakes region and Scandinavia. In both regions, ice phenology has changed more rapidly in warmer locations4,7; however, the influence of other meteorological variables (e.g., timing of snowfall, snow depth, and cloud cover) is not well understood. Overlain on this complexity is the combined impact of long term climate change and decadal scale oscillations.

We propose a workshop to begin a comparative investigation of ice phenology changes in Scandinavia and the Laurentian Great Lakes region. Ice phenology has been an active area of research for scientists at the NTL LTER site and its analogs in Sweden, Finland, and Switzerland. Using spatial analysis and time series techniques, we will investigate relationships between ice phenology, meteorological variables (snow and solar radiation), and large scale climate drivers (SOI, NAO, PDO, etc.). The contribution of individual lake characteristics (depth, surface area, and elevation) to these relationships will also be explored. The results will allow us to identify lake characteristics and geographic locations that are sensitive to climatically-induced changes in ice phenology. The workshop will also provide an opportunity to discuss available biological time series (zooplankton, fish recruitment, etc.) that may be compared with ice phenology, further develop aquatic research within the ILTER network and strengthen ties with long term ecological research sites in Sweden (potential ILTER sites).

This workshop is proposed for October 2007 at the Lake Erken field station of Uppsala University, Sweden with Barbara Benson, John Magnuson, Olaf Jensen (Ph.D. candidate) attending from the University of Wisconsin and, at a minimum, Gesa Weyhenmeyer (Uppsala University, Sweden), David Livingstone (Swiss Federal Inst. of Environmental Sci. and Tech.) and Johanna Korhonen (Finnish Environment Institute) attending as European partners.


3Magnuson, J.J. et al. 2000. Science 289:1743-1746; 4Jensen, O.P. et al. Limnology & Oceanography In review; 5Magnuson, J.J. et al. 2005. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 29:521-527; 6Weyhenmeyer, G. 2001. Ambio 30:565-571; 7 Weyhenmeyer, G. et al. 2004. Geophysical Research Letters 31:L07203.

Agenda

April 1

  • Arrivals
  • 6pm     Dinner

April 2

  • 7:30am Breakfast
  • 8:30am Welcome, logistics (Thorsten, Barbara)
  • Presentations on current research (related to ice) (15 min each)
  • Discuss goals for the week
  1. Go over available data, make accessible to everyone at workshop
  2. List of possible paper titles and data needs for each
  3. Preliminary list of people working on each topic in (2) and leader for each
  • 12-1pm Lunch
  • 1-5pm    Divide into smaller groups (~3 people each) focused around topics
    • Outline tasks associated with each topic (data compilation, analyses, figure generation, writing, etc
    • Kaffe Pause
    • Repeat small groups
  • 6pm Dinner

April 3

  • 7:30am  Breakfast    
  • 8:30am  Reports from groups
    • Analysis, outlining, writing, literature search, additional discussion
    • Possible submission of session proposal for ASLO (Jan 2009) http://www.aslo.org/forms/nice2009.html
  • 12-1pm Lunch
  • 1-5pm   Analysis, outlining, writing, literature search, additional discussion
  • 6pm Dinner

April 4

  • 7:30am Breakfast     
  • 8:30am Reports from groups (with outlines, key findings, and results!)
  • 12-1pm Lunch
  • 1-5pm    Divide into topic groups and discuss plans for finishing manuscripts
    • Review proposal for ASLO meeting session
    • Discuss plans for future workshops, collaborations, etc.    

Lake Ice Analysis Group (LIAG)

The Lake Ice Analysis Group is an international ad hoc group of scientists (see attached list) who participated in the lake ice workshop held at the Center for Limnology's Trout Lake Station. The workshop was sponsored by the University of Wisconsin-Madison through a US National Science Foundation grant associated with the US Long-Term Ecological Research Network entitled "North Temperate Lakes : Global Generalization and Analyses of Lakescapes, Biodiversity and Ice Phenology."

Changing Lake Variables

The overarching theme of this research is to determine how lake variables (e.g. ice cover, thermal structure, water level) have changed during the past century, and how they may continue to change under a changing climate. Currently, I am focusing on one dimensional and three dimensional hydrodynamic modeling of the NTL-LTER study lakes. Development of hydrodynamic models allows for understanding of lake dynamics that cannot be captured by field measurements, and also provides the ability to predict how changes in external ...

20 Year Energy Budget for Trout Bog

Water levels in several NTL-LTER study lakes reached historical lows during the summer of 2009, owing to general decreases in precipitation and increases in total evaporation during the ice-free seasons of 1998-2009. Balancing a water budget for temperate lakes is difficult, requiring detailed measurements of precipitation, groundwater fluxes and surface flows to estimate the amount of water lost through evaporation. The NTL-LTER Trout Bog site has long-term records of meteorological conditions, including terrestrial and solar radiation from ...

Heterotrophic Bacterial Community Patterns in Lake Mendota

Part of this research is about long-term heterotrophic bacterial community patterns in Lake Mendota, Wisconsin. Heterotrophic bacteria are responsible for nutrient cycling in aquatic systems. These preliminary abundance data indicate seasonal patterns in bacterial taxa (OTU’s). We will perform time-series analysis with these data together with environmental variables (water chemistry and meteorological factors) in order to investigate drivers of the bacterial community ...

Subscribe to long-term change