US Long-Term Ecological Research Network

North Temperate Lakes LTER: Macrophyte Rating - Madison Lakes Area 1995 - current

Abstract
Macrophytes are sampled in Lakes Mendota, Monona, Wingra, and Fish. In the Madison area surveys are conducted from a boat at stations located at depths from 1 to 4 meters at 0.5-m intervals along transects perpendicular to the lake shoreline. Macrophyte species coverage is determined by standardized rake method. Sampling Frequency: annually during summer (June - August) Number of sites: 4

Dataset ID
23
Date Range
-
Maintenance
ongoing
Metadata Provider
Methods
Aquatic macrophytes are sampled from a boat at stations located at depths from 1 to 4 meters at 0.5-m intervals along transects perpendicular to the lake shoreline of the four primary study lakes in the Madison area (Lakes Mendota, Monona, and Wingra, and Fish Lake) from June to August. A weighted, double-headed garden rake is cast off the front left, front right, rear left, and rear right of the boat and then dragged approximately 2 meters across the bottom by means of an attached line. For each rake cast, filamentous algae and any aquatic macrophyte species present are assigned a density rating from 0-5 based on the extent of coverage of the upper rake head. Determination of extent of coverage involves judgment of the surveyor as to the number of rake teeth and area of teeth covered by each species. It is necessary to separate plants to assess individual species coverage. Ratings from the 4 rake casts at each station can be averaged to compute an overall density rating for each species found at the station.
Detailed Macrophyte Sampling description.
Using the site book and the depth measuring pole, move to the 1 meter depth mark and throw both anchors. From the Macrophyte Depth Table, find the distance to throw out the rake and the meter mark that the line should be drawn to. The table is calculated to determine the starting and ending meter marks to draw in the line to allow the rake to drag 2 meters on the lake bottom. Pull the rake quickly out of the water. Before removing the plant material from the rake, drape the long strands over the rake and gently push the plant material down on the rake. Assign a rake rating (from 1 to 5) depending on how much the plant material covers the rake prongs. The rake prongs are painted in 20 percent increments. If the plant material only covers the lowest 20 percent of the rake prongs, assign the rake rating a 1. If the plant material covers between 20 percent and 40 percent of the rake prongs, the rake rating is a 2, and so on. If a significant amount of dirt has been brought up with the plants (i.e. the weight of the dirt will add significantly to the total weight), wash the plants. Separate the filamentous algae from the rest of the plant material. Separate and identify the individual plant species, throwing out any dead plant material. Give the filamentous algae and each plant species a rake rating (note that it is often necessary to visualize how much space each species would take up on the rake prongs rather than actually placing each species onto the rake). If a plant species can not be identified, take a sample back to the lab by putting it in a ziplock bag with a small amount of water and temporarily storing it in a cooler. Repeat the above steps until 4 rake tosses have been thrown. Normally 2 rake tosses are thrown out each side of the boat to an area where the water depth is known to be at the desired depth. Move to the next half-meter depth. Macrophytes are collected at each half-meter water depth from 1 meter to 4 meters.
Publication Date
Short Name
NTLMP03
Version Number
29

Cascade Project at North Temperate Lakes LTER: Zooplankton 1984 - 2007

Abstract
Zooplankton data from 1984-1995. Sampled approximately weekly with two net hauls through the water column (30 cm diameter net, 80 um mesh). There have been 5 zooplankton counters during this period, so species-level identifications (TAX, below) are not as consistent as those for some of the other datasets. To standardize across counters, I have assigned higher-level taxonomic categories for a few "confusing" taxa; these identifications can be found in the column LLTAX, below. Sampling Frequency: varies Number of sites: 5
Core Areas
Dataset ID
79
Date Range
-
LTER Keywords
Maintenance
completed
Metadata Provider
Methods
for counting details see: Christensen, D.L., S.R. Carpenter, K.L. Cottingham, S.E. Knight, J.P. LeBouton, D.E. Schindler, N. Voichick, J.J. Cole, and M.L. Pace. 1996. Pelagic responses to changes in dissolved organic carbon following division of a seepage lake. Limnology and Oceanography 41:553-559.
Short Name
CZOOP1
Version Number
5

Biocomplexity at North Temperate Lakes LTER; Coordinated Field Studies: Littoral Macrophytes 2001 - 2004

Abstract
The aquatic vegetation of 60 lakes selected for the "cross-lake comparison" segment of the Biocomplexity Project was surveyed during the month of August in years 2001 through 2004. The study lakes are located in Vilas County, Wisconsin and were chosen to represent a range of positions on gradients of both human development and landscape position. The purpose of the macrophyte portion of the "cross-lake comparison" study was to evaluate the roles of landscape position and human development in the presence and composition of macrophyte communities.
Core Areas
Dataset ID
127
Date Range
-
Maintenance
completed
Metadata Provider
Methods
The macrophyte surveys were performed at eight sites within each of the 60 lakes. The sites were chosen by randomly selecting two 50m segments of shoreline per compass quadrant of each lake. At each site, we examined the macrophytes to a depth of 2m along a 50 m long transect perpendicular to the shoreline, beginning at the center point of the 50m segment of shoreline selected for the site. Within a ? m2 quadrat at every meter mark, we noted the species present, the dominant species, the substrate composition and the total percent vegetation cover. If a depth of 2 m was reached before 20 quadrats were measured, a second transect was performed 25 m to the right of the initial point. The distances from shore at 1 m depth and 2 m depth were also recorded on each transect for an estimate of slope. Sampling Frequency: each site sampled once Number of sites: 60 Vilas County lakes were sampled from 2001-2004 (approximately 15 different lakes each year).At each site, we examined the littoral vegetation along a transect perpendicular to the shoreline. Within a 0.25 m2 quadrat at every meter mark, we recorded the total percent vegetation cover, dominant species and all species present to a water depth of 2 meters or 50 meters from shore. If a depth of 2 m was reached before 20 quadrats were measured, a second transect was performed 25 m to the right of the initial point. These observations were averaged to calculate percent total cover of vegetation in the littoral zone per lake (Marburg et al. 2005). The percent cover was transformed using arcsine square root of the decimal proportion.
Short Name
BIOMACR
Version Number
7
Subscribe to density rating