I. INTRODUCTION
We propose to continue our long-term ecological research
on temperate lakes and their surrounding landscape in
the Northern Highland Lake District of Wisconsin (Magnuson
et al. 1984) as part of the national, Long-Term
Ecological Research (LTER) network (Callahan 1984, Brenneman
1989, Magnuson and Bowser 1990, Franklin et al.
1990).
Our research expands upon the traditional boundaries
of ecosystem studies to encompass multiple temporal
and spatial scales. We consider a suite of adjacent
lakes that share a common climate but differ dramatically
in their physical, chemical, and biological characteristics.
We employ a long-term perspective that permits us to
place analyses of seasonal and annual patterns into
the broader context of year-to-year variability and
to evaluate the implications of such variability for
community and ecosystem processes. We use a nested series
of spatial scales ranging from within individual lakes
to the entire Northern Highland Lake District (Appendix
Fig. 1, p. 68). This permits us to consider how processes
occurring in a lake are related to factors in adjacent
systems and in the general landscape that surrounds
it. Our broad temporal and spatial scales lend themselves
to two expansions that we propose here; evaluations
of the potential effects of global change and assessments
of how processes discerned on smaller spatial scales
are operating within the region in general.
Lakes provide ideal systems for long-term ecological
research. Their boundaries are relatively distinct,
and adjacent lakes, although sharing a common setting,
may differ greatly in their fundamental properties.
Thus, comparisons of lakes can be used to isolate at
least partially important control factors for lake processes.
Their distinct boundaries make lakes particularly useful
for analyses of landscape-scale patterns. Likewise,
many in-lake processes operate on shorter time scales
than their analogs in terrestrial habitats (e.g., population
growth and succession). This facilitates the observation
of repeated sequences of processes within a few years
as well as experimental manipulations. These advantages
are coupled with a long tradition of limnological work
which has laid a groundwork for our research. A substantial
amount of this work was conducted on our LTER lakes
by Birge, Juday and their colleagues in the first half
of this century (Frey 1963, Beckel 1987).
In addition, because lake ecosystems superficially
appear quite different from the principal ecosystems
at the other, predominantly terrestrial LTER sites,
the inclusion of the NTL site within the LTER network
fosters the development of ecological theory at a more
general level. Concepts that apply to both aquatic and
terrestrial ecosystems must inherently have a broader
applicability than those generated for a more restricted
set of systems.
Within the synthetic goal of understanding the ecological
complexity generated by multiple processes acting over
many temporal and spatial scales, we aim to develop
a series of broad-scale evaluations of factors controlling
lake processes. These evaluations are interrelated but
can also be considered independently. They can be classed
generally into five major objectives:
- A. To perceive long-term trends in physical,
chemical, and biological properties of lake ecosystems
- B. To understand the dynamics of internal and
external processes affecting lake ecosystems
- C. To analyze the temporal responses of lake
ecosystems to disturbance and stress
- D. To evaluate the interaction between spatial
heterogeneity and temporal variability of lake ecosystems
- E. To expand our understanding of lake-ecosystem
properties to a broader, regional context.
We elaborate on these objectives separately in the
next five sections of the proposal. The first four objectives
have played a key role in our research over the past
five years. In discussing them, we highlight some of
our major results and then outline the continuations
that we propose. The last objective is new and reflects
an expanded interest in seeking generality at both the
site and the intersite level. Conceptual extensions
within the first four objectives include 1) a focus
on global climate change, 2) expanded evaluations of
microbial processes and 3) more detailed assessments
of land-water interactions.
II. SECTION 1 - RESEARCH PROGRESS AND PROPOSED
RESEARCH
The following section describes our past progress
and proposed research organized according to the five
major research objectives listed above.
A. PERCEPTION OF LONG-TERM TRENDS
1. THE NORTH TEMPERATE LAKES DATA SYSTEM
Introduction. Our goal is and has been to develop
a set of ecological measurements that will allow investigators
quantitatively to observe and analyze patterns of long-term
change in the physical, chemical, and biological features
of lake ecosystems. We also wanted to make available
the rich base of historic data collected earlier by
E.A. Birge, C. Juday, and colleagues (Frey 1963). Finally,
we wanted to establish an effective data management
system to make the modern and historic data easily available
to researchers.
Our choices of lakes and measurements were and continue
to be guided by a desire to address important ecological
and natural resource questions about lakes in respect
to long-term (Likens 1983, LeCren 1984) and landscape
level (Naveh and Lieberman 1984, Risser et al.
1984, Turner 1989) phenomena. These long-term measurements
at various ecological levels and several temporal and
spatial scales should be able to capture the essential
structure and function of lake ecosystems and enable
analyses of interactions among the principal ecosystem
components.
Results. We have focused on a suite
of lakes and surrounding terrestrial areas linked through
a common groundwater and surface water flow system that
share common climatic, edaphic, and biogeographic features
(Fig. 1; Appendix Fig. 2, p. 69). The lake set includes
oligotrophic, dystrophic, and mesotrophic lakes (Appendix
Fig. 3, p. 70; Appendix Fig. 4, p. 71). Our seven primary
lakes, located within 5.3 km of the Trout Lake Station
in north central Wisconsin, were chosen to represent
marked differences in size, morphometry and habitat
diversity, in thermal and chemical features, in species
richness and assemblies, and in biological productivity
(Table 1, p. 3). The choice of primary lakes makes groundwater
one major focus of our project, because of its importance
in regulating differences in the chemical composition
of lakes and in linking terrestrial and lake ecosystems
(Likens et al. 1977, Winter 1978, Frape et
al. 1984, Crowe and Schwartz 1981a, b).
We also have secondary lakes for which less complete
data are collected. The choice of secondary lakes and
types of measurements may change with time, but these
lakes are studied with long-term research goals in mind.
They serve for comparison with the primary lakes on
specific research questions of individual investigators.
For example Lake Mary, a meromictic lake, has the most
temporally stable deep water system and is useful to
compare with the other lakes which are influenced more
by year-to-year changes in weather. Presently, our secondary
lakes include: Clear, Escanaba, Fallison, Firefly (Weber),
Little Rock, Mary, Mendota, Mystery, Nebish, and Pallette.
Lake Mendota, our only study lake located outside the
Northern Highland area, is included because the extensive
and historical data available for Mendota are extremely
valuable, one example being the use of ice cover duration
to analyze climatic patterns (Robertson 1989, Magnuson
1990).
We spent considerable effort designing and implementing
a balanced and integrated data collection program (Kratz
et al. 1986). Our sampling (Appendix Table 2,
p.83) allows comparisons of parameters among seasons,
years, and lakes. We sample most major physical, chemical
and biological parameters. On each lake we established
a central station where related parameters are measured
concurrently.
Sampling frequency is tuned to the dynamics of individual
parameters. We sample most intensively at four key times
of the year: spring overturn, maximum stratification
in summer, fall overturn, and winter stratification.
Chemically, these periods are important because differences
between spring and fall overturns indicate a net gain
or removal of chemical species from the water column.
At periods of maximum stratification, conditions are
most different from mixis, and depletion of epilimnetic
nutrients and hypolimnetic oxygen can cause severe stresses
on biological components. Complete cation-anion balances
are computed during these four periods. Nutrients, pH,
inorganic and organic carbon are sampled monthly. Temperature,
dissolved oxygen, chlorophyll a, primary productivity,
and zooplankton abundance are measured every two weeks
during the open water season and every 5 weeks under
ice cover. Parameters that vary over longer time scales
are measured annually in August. These include macrophyte
distribution, fishes (abundance, biomass, and community
structure) and benthic invertebrate abundance. Typical
sampling sites, from two of our LTER lakes, are shown
in Fig. 2. In addition, groundwater levels in selected
wells are measured monthly and groundwater chemistry
from these wells is measured quarterly.
We maintain an automated land-based weather station
10 km from the Trout Lake Station. Parameters measured
include air and soil temperature; precipitation; longwave,
shortwave, and photosynthetically active radiation;
wind speed and direction; and relative humidity. Our
raft-based station on Sparkling Lake records air and
water temperature, wind speed at three elevations, and
relative humidity.
On occasion we have modified or developed measurement
techniques. For example, we have developed state-of-the-art
remote sensing for making acoustic estimates of distribution,
abundance, and body sizes of pelagic fishes in conjunction
with research sponsored by the Office of Naval Research
(Clay 1983, Rudstam et al. 1987, Jacobson et
al. 1989).
Proposed Research. We propose to continue the
base sampling and data collection (Appendix Table 2,
p. 83) started in the first 10 years (Magnuson et
al. 1984, Kratz et al. 1986).
2. LONG-TERM DATA AND USE OF HISTORIC DATA
Introduction. We have access to three kinds
of "long-term" data in our LTER project: data preserved
in historical documents, data preserved in lake sediments,
and data collected by the LTER program since 1981. Here,
we provide examples of the types of analyses of long-term
data that we have done using all three of these sources.
Comparing Recent Data with Historic Measurements.
We used historic data spanning 1852 to present to analyze
the link between ice cover of Lake Mendota and interannual
variability in weather conditions including El Nino
and climate change events. Unusual climatic conditions
in areas adjacent to the equatorial Pacific Ocean have
been shown to be directly related to El Nino events.
Our goal was to determine whether El Nino events have
influenced the climate of a more distant location, Wisconsin.
We analyzed meteorological parameters and the long-term
ice records with respect to the Southern Oscillation
Index (SOI), a monthly correlate of El Nino intensity
(Robertson 1989). Fourier Analysis, performed on the
coinciding time series, demonstrated a relationship
between ice duration on Lake Mendota and the SOI. After
1940, El Nino events are associated with consistent
climatic anomalies (Fig. 3, p.6), warmer than normal
December and March air temperatures with less than normal
snowfall, resulting in late ice formation, early thaw
and shorter than normal ice duration. Prior to 1940,
El Nino events were associated with more variable climatic
conditions. The ice conditions of Shell Lake, located
in northern Wisconsin, were unrelated to El Nino events,
possibly because Lake Superior's influence on local
climate concealed signals from El Nino events.
We also related changes in lake temperature and ice
cover to changes in mean air temperature associated
with known and predicted changes in climate (Fig. 4).
A step change in the duration of ice cover coincided
with the end of the little ice age. We also forecast
that if a 2XCO2 condition develops in the next 50 years
due to Greenhouse Warming, Lake Mendota will be ice
free 1 out of every 30 years by 2050 to 2060 (Robertson
1989).
Using the Sediment Record. We investigated
the sedimentary record of pigments in short cores taken
from Crystal, Sparkling, and Trout Lakes. Although diagenesis
of pigments within the water column and sediments is
significant, we were able to detect non-diagenetic trends
(Hurley and Armstrong 1990b). Changes in the proportion
of phaeophorbide suggest a period of reduced grazing
starting about 1930. The concentration of diatoxanthin,
a pigment associated with diatoms, increased sharply
between 1900 and 1935 (Fig. 5) as did total phorbin
and carotenoid pigment concentrations. This period corresponds
to a time of clearcutting and may reflect response of
Trout Lake to increased nutrient loading.
We discovered a relationship between a lake's dissolved
silica concentration and the width of spicules growing
in live sponges. Because sponge spicules are siliceous
and well preserved in lake sediments we were able to
use this relationship to reconstruct past silica concentrations
in several lakes. We obtained complete sediment cores
down to glacial material in three clearwater and six
dystrophic lakes. In each lake there is evidence of
a reduction in silica concentration over the holocene.
Results from two dystrophic lakes are shown in Fig.
6. Groundwater is the major external source of silica
to lakes in the region. The major sink is permanent
burial in the sediments in the form of diatom frustules.
Trends in silica suggest long-term changes in either
groundwater inputs or internal cycling of silica, or
both (p. 13 ).
Data Collected by the LTER Project. The LTER
project has now collected nine years of data for many
parameters. Here, we show three of the many examples
of interesting patterns in this long term data set.
In two of the examples, chloride concentration in Sparkling
Lake (Fig. 7) and water level from three lakes (Fig.
8, p. 9) we have a reasonably detailed understanding
of the underlying causes of the patterns. The chloride
increase is associated with road salt entering the groundwater
and entering Sparkling Lake (p. 15). The decrease in
water level associated with lower than normal precipitation
in the past few years is a function of the hydrologic
setting of the lake and gives an example of how different
lakes respond to the same climatic forcing. The third
example, a decrease in silica concentration in Sparkling
Lake (Fig. 9, p. 9), is an example of a trend that we
do not understand sufficiently. Trends such as these,
discovered serendipitously, are among the most intriguing
and scientifically exciting.
Proposed Research. We will continue using historical
archives, the sediment record, and the growing time
series of LTER data to stimulate new questions and to
ask and answer the questions developed in our major
objectives. These data will be the basis for answering
many of the research questions described in the next
four major sections.
B. DYNAMICS OF EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL PROCESSES
Long-term patterns in lakes are generated by a complex
interplay between external and internal processes. Evaluations
of long-term patterns must be linked with an understanding
of these processes. Because internal and external processes
operate on a variety of time scales, interactions among
them lead to complex patterns, often with time lags
between cause and event. Understanding how lakes are
affected by the interaction of process occurring on
different time scales, particularly when there are time
lags, is a major goal of our LTER program.
External processes influencing lakes include climatic
and hydrologic factors combined with land-water interactions.
Climate exhibits substantial year-to-year variation
with potentially major effects on lake conditions (Madden
1977). Climate also exhibits distinct long-term cyclic
behavior (Jones et al. 1982). Hydrologic differences
among the NTL-LTER lakes are associated primarily with
differences in groundwater inputs. These differences
exert important influences on both water and chemical
budgets. Variability in the groundwater system operates
over a longer time frame than other components of the
hydrologic budget such as precipitation and surface
runoff. Land-water interactions involve linkages between
terrestrial and aquatic systems in which numerous processes
operate at fundamentally different time scales (contrast
the growth and decomposition of trees versus phytoplankton).
Internal processes involve a diversity of physical,
chemical, and biological factors. Again, the interplay
of processes acting over different time scales leads
to complex behavior. For example, a lake's primary production
during mid-summer could be controlled directly by the
extent of turnover during the previous spring and by
the amount of grazing exhibited by herbivorous zooplankton
during that period. Each of these processes in turn
can be linked with longer-term factors such external
nutrient loading and the year-class strengths of zooplanktivorous
fishes. Consequently, primary production in one summer
may be partly determined not only by present conditions,
but also by year class formation of fish three years
prior and the length of the turnover period in the previous
spring.
A major goal of our LTER program is to develop a basic
understanding of the roles of external and internal
processes in influencing lake ecosystem conditions.
Our primary efforts in this area include: 1) identification
of major linkages between specific external or internal
processes and limnological conditions, 2) evaluation
of the interactions that occur among major external
and internal processes, and 3) assessment of how long-term
variability in specific processes influences long-term
patterns in lake ecosystem parameters. Below we highlight
separately some of our major research efforts on external
and internal lake processes. This separation is not
absolute but rather one of emphasis. Our goal has been
to integrate both external and internal processes to
generate a basic understanding of lake ecosystem processes.
1. External Processes
Our investigations of external lake processes have
emphasized considerations of climate, groundwater hydrology,
and land-water interactions.
a. Climate
Introduction. Climatic forcing controls
the thermal environment of north temperate lakes by
determining the timing of freeze and thaw, the length
of the growing season, the depth of the mixed layer,
the intensity of stratification, and the temperature
of the various water layers. Thermal conditions form
the setting for a lake's chemical and biological processes,
many of which have rates dependent on water temperature.
The LTER database is ideal for investigating the role
of climatic variability in generating long-term trends
in limnological processes (Robertson 1989) and in exploring
relationships between climatic and non-climatic factors
in lakes (Magnuson et al. 1990d). The threat
of drastic climate change in the next century increases
our incentive to learn about how lakes respond to climatic
forcing. We will use the LTER database to develop and
verify models of thermal, chemical, and biological conditions
in the lakes relevant to global climate change.
Results. One emphasis of our climate
research has focused on the effects of climatic factors
on thermal conditions within lakes. Robertson (1989)
used a long time series of ice cover records for Lake
Mendota to reveal climatic variation on several time
scales (Fig. 3, p. 6; Fig. 4, p. 7).
Robertson (1989) also demonstrated the utility of
statistical and functional models in predicting thermal
properties of lakes based on climatic variables. An
empirical model employing meteorological conditions
and water temperature successfully predicted the times
of ice-on and ice-off for Lake Mendota. Climatic variables
likewise showed the highest degree of temporal coherence
in long-term comparisons across the LTER primary study
lakes (Magnuson et al. 1990d).
Proposed Research. One of our long-range goals
is to predict changes in limnological processes due
to global climate change. This involves a three step
process in which we 1) develop models of the influence
of climate on thermal conditions within lakes, 2) predict
the impacts of warming scenarios on lake conditions,
and 3) examine the effects of predicted thermal conditions
on internal lake processes.
What is the relation between climatic factors and
thermal conditions in lakes? We will explore the
relationship between climatic forcing and thermal response
of lakes using functional and statistical models (Magnuson
et al. 1990c). Modeling the annual thermal structure
of the lakes requires predictions of the timing of ice
formation and breakup, evaluation of heat exchange between
the lake and atmosphere, and analysis of internal heat
redistribution processes. For statistical models, we
will employ the methods used to predict ice cover on
the Lake Mendota (Robertson 1989) to develop similar
models for other LTER lakes, using the historical meteorological
database and ice cover records. We will also expand
on existing functional models (e.g., Imberger and Patterson
1981) to predict the development of thermal conditions
within lakes during the ice-free season. These models
include explicit formulations of heat exchange at the
air-water interface and between layers within the lake
and predict thermocline depth and seasonal changes in
epilimnetic and hypolimnetic temperatures. We intend
to implement such models for several NTL LTER lakes.
How will thermal structure of lakes change following
global climate warming? Using the models described
above, we can create scenarios of the thermal structure
of our lakes following global climate change using scenarios
output from GCM's (e.g., Manabe and Stouffer 1980, Hansen
et al. 1988). Transient climate warming scenarios
are available representing the evolution of the global
climate from 1XCO2 to 2XCO2 conditions. We will use
these transient warming scenarios to predict the timing
of thermal changes in our lakes.
How will lake processes respond to global climate
warming? The chemical and biological responses of
lakes to warming scenarios can be evaluated using models
with varying levels of sophistication. Some models examine
the influence of temperature on mass transport and kinetic
interactions of biota and nutrients (Park et al.
1974, Blumberg and DiToro 1990). A relatively simple
version of such a model might consider the dynamics
of chlorophyll-a, carbon associated with zooplankton,
phosphorus, nitrogen, silica, and dissolved oxygen.
Such a model would be lake-specific and could be calibrated
with LTER lake data. More detailed models could include
the effects of individual species responses to changing
thermal conditions. Several models incorporating these
factors have been generated for lakes similar to those
at our LTER site (Carpenter and Kitchell 1987).
The effects of global climate warming can be expected
to be particularly strong on fish assemblages in north
temperate lakes. The occurrence of fish assemblages
in LTER lakes has been directly linked to the availability
of suitable temperatures (McLain and Magnuson 1988).
Bioenergetics models (Kitchell et al. 1977) can
be used to produce scenarios of fish growth following
climate warming (Hill and Magnuson 1990). Thermal niche
models (Magnuson et al. 1990e) can provide estimates
of changes in water volumes with temperatures suitable
for different thermal guilds of fish (Magnuson et
al. 1979). We will use changes in thermal niche
space to forecast potential species extinctions or invasions
in the lakes.
b. Hydrology
Introduction. Lakes within the NTL-LTER
site vary markedly in the contributions of precipitation,
groundwater, and surface water to the input portion
of their hydrologic budgets. A strong gradient exists
among our primary LTER study lakes that reflects increasing
proportions of groundwater inputs (Okwueze 1983). This
gradient has served as a major organizing theme in our
program. We have examined this gradient's influence
by 1) quantifying groundwater inputs, 2) determining
the effect of groundwater on lake conditions, and 3)
examining the role of groundwater in the transport of
solutes, particularly nutrients and contaminants. We
have emphasized studies of individual lakes. Success
at this level permits us to expand our proposed efforts
to a more regional scale.
Results. Quantitative hydrologic studies were
initiated on Crystal Lake, which represents one extreme
in the groundwater input gradient, with a marked predominance
of precipitation inputs (Kenoyer 1986). Groundwater
accounted for only 5% of input water to Crystal Lake,
yet, because groundwater is more concentrated chemically
than precipitation, groundwater accounted for substantial
amounts of incoming solutes. For example, about 50%
of the silica budget comes into the lake via groundwater,
exerting a major influence on primary production in
Crystal Lake (Table 2, p. 13) (Hurley et al.
1985). Detailed evaluations of groundwater flow paths
confirmed that silicate hydrolysis in the glacial till
surrounding the LTER lakes led to increasing concentrations
of minerals with increasing time of groundwater contact
with till (Fig. 10, Kenoyer et al. in press).
Groundwater inputs to lakes like Crystal have the potential
to vary substantially from year to year and provide
a mechanism to control year-to-year differences in other
lake parameters such as primary production or chlorophyll.
Sparkling Lake, lying at an intermediate elevation
and with a presumed, higher proportional contribution
of groundwater to its hydrologic inputs, was the next
focus for quantitative evaluation. The more complex
flow regime for Sparkling Lake, with substantial groundwater
inputs and outputs led to the development of new techniques
for quantifying hydrologic budgets. Stable isotope analyses
of oxygen and hydrogen were coupled with more traditional,
well measurements to evaluate the importance of groundwater
in the lake's hydrologic budget (Krabbenhoft et al.
in press a, b). We discovered that local groundwater
had an isotopic signature distinct from mean annual
precipitation values (Fig. 11). These differences exist
because most inputs to the groundwater flow system occur
during winter when the isotopic composition of precipitation
differs from other seasons. During summer, precipitation
is transpired and groundwater recharge is minimal. Models
are being developed to examine the relationship between
lake isotopic composition and the proportional contribution
of groundwater to hydrologic inputs for lakes in general
(McGrath et al. 1988).
Bog lakes at our LTER site are isolated to a large
extent from surrounding groundwater flow systems. However,
our studies have revealed that bog lakes exhibit a similar
pattern, across landscapes, to that exhibited by the
LTER lakes in general. The proportional input of groundwater
to the bogs' hydrologic inputs increases with decreasing
elevation in the landscape (Fig. 12, p. 15; Kratz and
Medland in press). More detailed studies of Crystal
Bog reveal a complex interplay between conditions in
the lake and in the surrounding wetland due to the groundwater
flow regime and resulting chemical transfers (Marin
et al. in press).
The groundwater flow system can serve as either a
barrier or a conduit to the transport of anthropogenic
contaminants. The rate at which acid deposition falling
within a region is transported to a lake varies substantially
with hydrologic regime (Anderson and Bowser 1986). Because
of buffering during groundwater flow, only lakes with
a predominance of precipitation input would be expected
to respond to acid deposition. In contrast, another
contaminant, road salt, is transported fairly efficiently
(Krabbenhoft and Bowser ms). This pathway has lead to
a substantial systematic increase in the chloride concentration
of Sparkling Lake since 1982. Even in the case of road
salt, however, groundwater flow does not serve as a
simple conduit. Increases in Na, the predominant cation
paired with Cl in road salt, do not match those for
Cl indicating that soil and aquifer ion-exchange processes
are impeding its transport.
Proposed Research. Our goal is to integrate
hydrologic studies with overall evaluations of lake
conditions. This will involve two primary areas: continuing
evaluations of the hydrologic budgets of individual
lakes and expanding our hydrologic perspective to include
a regional analysis of our entire study site.
What are the contributions of groundwater, precipitation,
and surface flow to hydrologic and chemical budgets
of Trout Lake? Our analyses of hydrologic inputs
have moved from simpler to more complex systems. Trout
Lake, the lowest elevation lake in our landscape, is
the next logical choice for detailed study. The significant
contribution of surface flow into Trout Lake will require
an expansion of the methods that we have used for seepage
lakes to include measurements of surface water flow.
We will undertake these efforts in cooperation with
the Wisconsin District of the U.S. Geological Survey.
Can stable isotope techniques be used to evaluate
hydrologic processes for lakes and watersheds? Our
work on Sparkling Lake has indicated the utility of
stable isotope techniques for individual lakes, but
the general applicability of these methods to larger
scale systems remains to be explored. The stable isotope
signature of oxygen and hydrogen of a water body at
a particular time reflects an interplay between hydrologic
processes that alter the proportions of stable isotopes
and those that do not cause fractionation. Stable isotopes
ratios are affected by evaporation but not by flow processes
or transpiration. The degree of isotopic fractionation
during evaporation varies as a function of temperature,
relative humidity and the magnitude of evaporation itself.
The isotopic signature of precipitation, in turn, varies
with season and among storm events reflecting, in part,
differences in evaporative processes.
The development of a general methodology for the use
of stable isotopes in evaluating lake hydrology will
require the cross-calibration of isotopic techniques
with other more traditional measures of hydrologic parameters.
We are expanding our measurements of such parameters
for our LTER study lakes through the use of a combination
of land-based and floating meteorological stations and
expanded well networks. These measurements will be combined
with previous hydrologic studies conducted near our
LTER site (e.g., Little Rock Lake).
Stable isotope analyses will also provide insight
into watershed processes. Summer precipitation appears
to be largely captured and transpired by terrestrial
vegetation, whereas winter precipitation is recharged
into the groundwater system. Thus, with proper calibration,
isotopic contrasts between local groundwater and rain
should provide an estimate of long-term rates of terrestrial
transpiration. This work will play an important role
in our regionalization efforts (p. 42) and in our assessments
of effects of global climate change (p. 10).
How are lake chemical conditions influenced by
variability in groundwater inputs? Our work on lake/groundwater
interactions has focussed on the chemistry of major
ions and silica. We will expand these efforts to include
assessments of additional elements, particularly N and
P. By combining chemical analyses of groundwater, streamflow,
and precipitation with the quantitative measures of
these flows described above, we will be able to make
direct assessments of their relative contributions to
lake chemical budgets for the full range of lakes in
our flow system.
We also will expand our work on the transport of contaminants
by groundwater. The trends in Sparkling Lake's chemistry
provide an ideal opportunity to examine these processes.
The seasonally pulsed nature of road salt use may provide
a particularly useful marker for examining trends in
groundwater flow and in the transport of contaminants.
This work will involve more detailed monitoring of wells
near Sparkling Lake coupled with groundwater modeling.
c. Interaction between Terrestrial and Aquatic
Ecosystems
Introduction. The NTL-LTER site is a mosaic
of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems (Appendix Fig.
1, p. 68) where terrestrial systems have the potential
to exert major influences on lake conditions. Such terrestrial
influences operate directly through the input of allochthonous
materials and indirectly through an influence on hydrologic
inputs. Characteristics of terrestrial ecosystems surrounding
lakes, and their potential influence on lakes, vary
as a function of soil substrate and natural and/or human-mediated
disturbance regimes. Therefore, landscape position and
disturbance regimes of terrestrial ecosystems must be
considered in evaluating the factors influencing long-term
patterns in aquatic ecosystems.
Results. Landform and soils vary greatly within
the NTL-LTER study site reflecting past glacial history.
Soils range from coarse sands with low water holding
capacity and nutrient availability to fine loams with
moderate to high water and nutrient availability (Appendix
Fig. 5, p. 72). Several studies have demonstrated the
relationship between soil characteristics and vegetation
in the region (Curtis 1959, Kotar et al. 1988).
Studies in the Pacific Northwest have demonstrated strong
correlations between soil water availability and vegetational
characteristics such as leaf area index (Grier and Running
1977, Gholz 1982) and net above-ground primary production
(Gholz 1982). Vegetation is further influenced by disturbance
and management regimes; these factors and their interaction
have led to substantial differences in the vegetation
surrounding the primary LTER study lakes (Appendix Fig.
5, p. 72) with important consequences for land-water
interactions.
Allochthonous inputs add significant but varied quantities
of carbon and nutrients to our study lakes (Appendix
Fig. 6, p. 73). Perry and co-workers estimated that
annual leaf litter inputs range from 400-1720 g/m of
shoreline; annual phosphorus inputs associated with
the fine litter ranged from 300-1470 mg/m of shoreline.
The importance of leaf inputs varies among the LTER
lakes owing to differences in landscape position, forest
species composition along shorelines, and shoreline
length relative to lake volume. Decay rates for allochthonous
inputs also varied among lakes and with the species
of source material.
Vegetational characteristics of the NTL-LTER site
have undergone substantial changes over the past 125
years (Table 3). The pine forests that predominated
in the region during presettlement times have been largely
superseded by northern hardwoods (Morrison and Ribanszky
1989). Differences in vegetation also have the potential
to influence the quantity and quality of groundwater
flow within a region (as discussed above). These vegetation
shifts have the potential to influence present day lake
conditions with a variety of time lags. Shifts due to
differences in the nature of allochthonous materials
entering the lakes would occur within a few years for
most materials. In contrast, there are substantial lags
between the time water enters the groundwater and when
it reaches a lake (Anderson and Bowser 1986).
Proposed Research. Expanded research here
will focus on more detailed measures of the interaction
between aquatic and terrestrial systems.
How does vegetation affect the hydrologic regimes
of lakes? The absolute quantity of hydrologic inputs
to lakes and the chemical characteristics of those inputs
are influenced by the characteristics of terrestrial
systems that surround them. For example, Swank and Douglas
(1974) demonstrated that streamflow is greatly reduced
by converting deciduous hardwood forests to pine due
to the greater annual water losses via evapotranspiration
in pine than deciduous hardwood forests. Borman and
Likens (1979) observed a large increase in streamflow
from a watershed that was harvested and noted that annual
solute content in the stream was positively correlated
to annual streamflow volume. We will develop a general
model of the interplay between landform, vegetation,
and hydrologic conditions for the NTL-LTER region.
Vegetational characteristics of the region will be
determined through the use of remote sensing and GIS
technologies (Appendix Fig. 5, p. 72). Preliminary studies
suggest that the Landsat Thematic Mapper T can provide
accurate hardwood vs. softwood and upland vs. lowland
forest type separation (Hopkins et al. 1988,
Morrison and Ribanszky 1989). Researchers in the Environmental
Remote Sensing Center will continue to develop systems
for analyzing TM data using GIS technologies.
Leaf Area Index has proven to be a useful ecosystem
parameter for comparing energy, mass, and water exchange
across diverse ecosystems (Running et al. 1986,
1989; Running and Nemani 1988, Running and Coughlan
1988), and can be quantified by remote sensing, in some
systems (Running et al. 1986, Peterson et
al. 1987). Leaf Area Index will be combined with
information on environmental factors in an ecosystem
process model (FOREST-BGC, Running and Coughlan 1988)
to estimate major water fluxes in terrestrial systems.
This model was developed for coniferous forests and
it will be modified for use with other forest types
present at our site. Forest models will be combined
with ongoing projects, funded separately by NSF
(to Gower et al.) to examine above- and below-ground
carbon balances for terrestrial ecosystems.
What are the relative effects of allochthonous
inputs of coarse woody and fine litter material on dynamics
of lakes? Recent studies have demonstrated that
coarse woody detritus can equal or exceed leaf litter
input in some forest ecosystems (Vogt et al.
1986, Harmon et al. 1986). We propose to establish
long-term plots along the shoreline of selected LTER
lakes and bogs to estimate coarse woody detritus production.
In addition, we plan to initiate a long-term woody decomposition
study to estimate carbon and nutrient immobilization-mineralization
patterns of woody material placed in lakes and bogs.
This information will be combined with the studies on
carbon dynamics described above and with the fine-litter
detritus study by Perry.
How do long-term changes in terrestrial vegetation
influence lakes? We will extend previous analyses
of long-term changes in terrestrial vegetation for the
regions adjacent to the seven LTER lakes and develop
a more extensive analysis for northern Wisconsin. We
will rely on historic vegetation surveys (Finley 1951)
to recreate past vegetation patterns. Present conditions
will be assessed using remote sensing and GIS technologies
in conjunction with the modeling efforts discussed above.
These data will be combined with our process oriented
studies of terrestrial interaction with lakes (described
above) to assess the importance of shifting landscape
conditions on lakes.
2. Internal Lake Processes
Evaluations of internal processes emphasize controls
over the phytoplankton, in terms of chlorophyll abundance
and primary production, and the abundance of aquatic
species in general.
a. Seasonal Chlorophyll Dynamics
Introduction. Chlorophyll density
is a conspicuous lake feature controlled by an interplay
of external and internal factors. At a given time, the
standing biomass of chlorophyll within a lake results
from an interaction of growth and loss processes. Differences
in both growth rates, sometimes termed "bottom-up" control
(Dillon and Rigler 1974, Schindler 1978, and McQueen
et al. 1986), and loss rates, termed "top-down"
control (Edmondson and Litt 1982, Shapiro and Wright
1984, Carpenter et al. 1985, 1987) have been
shown to control chlorophyll biomass under some circumstances.
It is unclear how the relative importance of these factors
vary under natural conditions (Crowder et al.
1988), but models considering both bottom up and top
down controls perform better that those focusing on
either process alone (Carpenter et al. in press).
Results. Three LTER study lakes exhibit fundamental
long-term differences in their seasonal chlorophyll
dynamics. In Trout Lake, for every year between 1982
and 1989, spring and fall chlorophyll maxima are routinely
punctuated by summer and winter minima (Fig. 13) in
a pattern that is characteristic of many temperate-zone
lakes (Hutchinson 1967, Marshall and Peters 1989). Two
other lakes diverge from this pattern with reduced spring
peaks in Allequash Lake in most years and with reduced
fall peaks in Sparkling lakes in many years (Fig. 13).
Can these differences, particularly the absence of a
peak in some seasons, be attributed to a predominance
of differences in growth or loss processes? Information
on nutrients and zooplankton biomass indicate that they
can not.
Reduced availabilities of nutrients in some seasons
or years, owing to differences in mixing events or loading,
would be a likely mechanism to lead to reduced chlorophyll
levels through shifts in growth rates. Data on nitrate,
used here as a general marker of the input of nutrients,
indicates substantial year-to-year differences in peak
concentrations in lakes and seasons (Fig. 14) but these
differences are not correlated with peak chlorophyll
concentrations. Shifts in the grazing pressure exerted
by herbivorous zooplankton could also reduce chlorophyll
levels through shifts in loss. Zooplankton biomass varies
markedly across seasons and years in both Trout Lake
and Sparkling Lake (Fig. 15, p. 23) but here too there
is no correlation between chlorophyll and zooplankton.
Proposed Research Can inter-lake and interannual
differences in peak chlorophyll values be associated
with shifts in growth processes or loss processes?
Our approach involves combining our continued, long-term
measurements of lake chlorophyll, nutrients, and zooplankton
with a series of more detailed measurements of the nutrient
and zooplankton dynamics taken during periods of increasing,
maximum, and declining chlorophyll concentrations. We
will focus on the epilimnion as a reasonable unit within
which to develop a budget of the net interplay of growth
and loss processes. The importance of nutrients will
be assessed through experimental manipulations of nutrient
availability along with direct assays for N and P stress.
The influence of zooplankton will be evaluated directly
using microcosms with various levels of grazing pressure
(Lehman and Sandgren 1985). The role of mixing phenomena
in controlling the availability of nutrients will be
assessed through continuous monitoring of thermal profiles
of our study systems. Funding to support our maximum
expansion in this area has been requested in a separate
proposal to the NSF Ecology Program (p. 118). If we
fail to obtain that funding, we will conduct a reduced
series of more detailed experiments and measurements
than have been routinely included in our LTER sampling.
b. Controls on Primary Production
Introduction. As in the case of chlorophyll
biomass, the factors controlling a lake's primary production
are a fundamental concern for aquatic ecosystem ecologists.
We have focused on a subset of three of our primary
study lakes to examine factors influencing production.
The lakes were chosen to provide generally contrasting
limnological conditions.
Results. Based upon several factors including
secchi depths, major differences in groundwater inflow
and associated solute loadings (Kratz et al.
1986), we had anticipated substantial differences in
primary production among Crystal, Trout, and Sparkling
Lakes. Several years of data on average daily rates
of depth-integrated primary production, however, revealed
remarkable similarities among the three lakes (117,
93, and 86 g C/m2/year for Trout, Sparkling, and Crystal
(Adams et al. in press)). We have been examining
the factors that account for this similarity, including
possible differences in light penetration, similarities
in nutrient loading particularly to the photic zone,
and differences in internal nutrient cycling. Sampling
for primary production is shown in Appendix Fig. 7,
p. 74.
Light penetration varies substantially among Crystal,
Sparkling and Trout Lakes with corresponding differences
in the depth of the water column over which primary
production occurs (Fig. 16, p. 24). Proportionally more
production occurs at greater depths in Crystal Lake
compensating for higher levels in shallower regions
of Sparkling and Trout Lakes. These differences are
attributable not only to differences in seston among
the lakes but also to major differences in dissolved
organic carbon (DOC). This DOC absorbs substantial quantities
of light and competes with phytoplankton for light.
A simulation in which the DOC in Crystal was increased
to the levels that occur in Trout resulted in a 30 %
decrease in calculated production (Kratz and Meinke,
in prep.). Thus, relatively small differences in DOC
may affect light penetration substantially and play
a major role in regulating production in lakes where
nutrient levels are low and photic zone may extend below
the thermocline. Phytoplankton vary in their quantum
use efficiency across lakes, with depth and with season.
We expect this variation in how phytoplankton use light
to be related to variability in primary production across
lakes.
Similarities in production may also be related to
nutrient inputs. Although groundwater inflow and solute
loadings increase in the order Trout >Sparkling>>Crystal,
the loading of limiting nutrients may be similar among
the lakes. Low phosphate concentrations and high C/P
ratios in seston (Hurley 1984) indicate P limitation
during much of the year in all three lakes. P levels
in groundwaters are low, and atmospheric deposition
may be a relatively important external source of P,
resulting in relatively similar areal loadings of P
among the three lakes.
Internal cycling may also result in similar limiting
nutrient loadings to the photic zones of the three lakes.
Significant differences have been observed in the cycling
of C, N, and P among the lakes. For carbon, sediment
trap and bottom sediment accumulation rate measurements
(Table 4, Hurley 1984 and NTL-LTER database) indicate
high (> 50%) but similar decomposition rates in the
sediments. Total water column respiration rates appear
to be quite similar, but substantial differences in
zooplankton biomass among lakes suggest that the proportion
of carbon respired by zooplankton is much lower in Crystal
than in Trout or Sparkling. This suggests that microbial
respiration must be substantially higher in Crystal.
These evaluations are only approximate and direct assessments
of microbial respiration and production are planned
to further ascertain the fate of produced carbon.
Internal cycling of P and N contrasts with that of
C and exhibits substantial differences among Crystal,
Sparkling and Trout Lakes. Low C/P ratios in bottom
sediments as compared to seston reflect selective chemical
immobilization of P in sediments (Table 5 ). C/P ratios
higher than a Redfield proportion in Crystal Lake but
substantially lower in Sparkling and Trout indicate
that P is recycled much more efficiently from bottom
sediments in Crystal Lake (Hurley 1984). Within the
NTL-LTER region, the recycling of inorganic P from sediments
has been linked with an interplay between Fe concentrations
and the extent of anoxic conditions (Williams et
al. 1971). These factors appear to be operating
to generate the differences observed in P cycling within
the LTER lakes. Evaluations of C/N ratios indicate that
N cycling shows a similar pattern to that of P with
a greater recycling of N in Crystal and Sparkling Lakes
than in Trout.
Proposed Research. Our results to date
indicate the influence of several factors in controlling
the production of our study lakes. Evaluations of the
interplay of these factors remain to be completed.
What is the role of nutrient loading to the photic
zone in controlling primary production among lakes differing
in groundwater inflow? With a database of several years
on primary production and seston deposition from the
water column combined with data on groundwater inflow,
atmospheric deposition, and sedimentation rates, we
are in position to evaluate the budgets of C, N, and
P to the photic zone. We plan to develop ecosystem level
models to evaluate these budgets for Crystal, Sparkling,
and Trout Lakes. Several questions will be addressed:
What are the relative nutrients fluxes from groundwater,
atmospheric deposition, and internal recycling? Are
year-to-year variations in fluxes appreciable? Is the
flux of phosphorus limiting? Is immobilization of phosphorus
in sediments a major factor regulating the phosphorus
supply? What is the relative importance of regeneration
within the water column (zooplankton, bacteria) and
at the sediment-water interface (bacterial)?
To what extent does the proportion of primary production
processed by zooplankton and the microbial food web
vary among lakes? Estimates to date suggest that the
relative proportion of carbon processed by microbes
and zooplankton varies markedly across our study lakes.
Our assessments have been limited, however, by a lack
of direct measures of microbial processing. We propose
to make direct determinations of microbial production
and couple them with more detailed assessments of zooplankton
grazing. This work will also be coupled with the nutrient
budgets discussed above to evaluate the influence of
microbes and zooplankton on primary production.
Bacterial production and respiration will be measured
directly. Ideally, this work will be done in collaboration
with Cole and Pace and/or with Dodson and Graham; both
groups have grants pending at NSF to support this work.
If their proposals are unsuccessful, more limited assessments
will be made within our LTER program. Assessments of
zooplankton effects will be expanded through the use
of more detailed calculations based on species and size
abundance data and size/species-specific respiration
rates (Downing and Rigler 1984) and grazing rates (Sierszen
and Frost In press), and through measurements of the
proportion of chlorophyll a converted to phaeophorbide
and collected in sedimentation traps (Hurley and Armstrong
1990a, 1990b). These data will be combined with carbon
budgets of the water column, and fluxes of C into and
accumulating in sediments to estimate bacterial respiration
in sediments.
What is the role of P immobilization by Fe in limiting
production in the NTL region? Our data suggest that
P immobilization in sediments is strongly influenced
by Fe, however, information on the role of Fe-P interactions
relative to other factors limiting production is scarce.
Measurements of the sedimentary component of C, N, P
budgets combined with analyses of sedimentary inorganic
P will be used to assess selective immobilization of
P and its influence on regeneration of P relative to
N (Armstrong et al. 1987). These evaluations
will be expanded to include other lakes in the region
with a wider range of Fe fluxes and sedimentary accumulation
rates.
The influence of Fe on P release by sediments is strongly
influenced by sediment anoxia. The potential for influences
on the photic zone and primary production are high when
P is released into the epilimnion or metalimnion. Thus,
the sediment contact area in the metalimnetic zone plays
an important role in seasonal internal cycling of P
(Stauffer and Armstrong 1984). We will also investigate
whether morphometry-related sedimentary P recycling
plays an important role in the NTL region.
c. Shifts in Species Abundance
Introduction. Understanding the factors
that control the presence or absence of species within
an ecosystem is a fundamental goal for both ecological
and evolutionary studies, particularly at a time when
there is a major interest in the factors controlling
the overall diversity of organisms. Moreover, studies
of aquatic systems have revealed numerous cases where
the abundance of particular species exerts a major influence
on both community and ecosystem processes. Paine (1980)
and Brooks and Dodson (1965), provided classic examples
of fundamental shifts in community structure induced
by single species and presaged numerous examples of
the importance of such species driven processes (Stein
et al. 1988). Hrbacek et al. (1961), Shapiro
and Wright (1984), and Carpenter et al. (1987)
have demonstrated that the effects of such species shifts
can extend beyond community composition to exert a major
influence over ecosystem processes.
Results. Within the LTER primary study
lakes, our analyses of species abundance patterns have
revealed that major species shifts are common. We have
used these shifting abundance patterns, coupled with
the comparative network provided by our lakes, to explore
the factors controlling long-term variability in population
levels. In addition, we have used these shifts to examine
the impact of such changes on ecosystem processes and
the importance of time lags that occur between events
controlling a particular taxon and their subsequent
effects on ecosystem processes.
Introductions of exotic species (e.g., rainbow smelt
and rusty crayfish) into some of our LTER lakes provide,
perhaps, the most dramatic cases of shifting species
abundances (see Disturbance Section p. 30). In addition
to these invasions, we have documented numerous instances
where fish and zooplankton species have undergone shifts
of greater than two orders of magnitude in abundance
during a two to three year period. Crystal Lake provides
a prime example. Here strong year classes of yellow
perch in some years contrast with a nearly complete
absence in other years. In other LTER lakes, other fishes,
particularly zooplanktivorous cisco have undergone dramatic
population shifts (Fig. 17). Similar patterns occur
for zooplankton and benthic populations.
Situations where population levels are substantially
different among years allow examination of factors controlling
populations, particularly when the comparisons can be
expanded to include two or more lakes. Shifts in cisco
populations (Fig. 17) show the value of this approach.
Autecological studies revealed that cisco require cold,
oxygenated waters (Rudstam and Magnuson 1985). Such
habitat conditions were met in Trout and Sparkling Lakes
but were unavailable in Big Muskellunge Lake during
1982 (Fig. 18). Cisco were lost from Big Muskellunge
Lake during this period but persisted in Trout and Sparkling
Lakes. Thus cisco were excluded by physical and chemical
conditions (McLain and Magnuson 1988). In a similar
type of study, direct experimental analyses (Gonzalez
1988) showed that seasonal declines in rotifer populations
were controlled by differing levels of food limitation.
Broader comparative analyses have revealed the influence
of varying silica levels on freshwater sponges (Frost
and Elias in press) and the capacity of an animal-capturing
plant to vary its investment in carnivory in direct
response to differences in habitat conditions (Knight
and Frost submitted).
Observations of Crystal Lake provide a strong example
of the link between species shifts and ecosystem parameters.
Adult yellow perch are zooplanktivores when they occur
in a lake's pelagic zone. During years in which adult
perch are abundant in the pelagic zone of Crystal Lake,
the average concentration of the lakes dominant herbivore,
a calanoid copepod, is markedly reduced (Fig. 19). Correlated
with this reduction is a substantial decrease in the
lake's water clarity attributable to a change in the
standing biomass of primary producers. These shifts
in water clarity appear to be influenced, at least in
part, by events initiated two and three years prior
to their impact (Magnuson 1990, Magnuson et al.
1990b). The abundance of adult yellow perch is linked
directly to the success of year class recruitment, which
is controlled by weather conditions during the first
year of life. Thus, the shifts in water clarity observed
in the lake are linked to external, climatic processes
that operate with a two to three year time lag.
Proposed Research. Ultimately, a major
goal of our research is to link separate studies of
external and internal processes in a detailed evaluation
of lake conditions. Shifts in species abundance with
subsequent impacts on trophic interactions provide an
organizing theme around which to build such a synthesis.
What is the relative role of external and internal
factors in driving year-to-year differences in water
clarity of Crystal Lake? As discussed above, we have
observed substantial year-to-year differences in the
secchi depth of Crystal Lake (Fig. 19). We have also
identified two distinctly different mechanisms that
could impart such year-to-year differences. Year classes
of yellow perch can exert very different grazing pressures
on the lake in different years. Likewise, year-to-year
differences in groundwater inputs also have the potential
to fuel substantially different levels of
primary production. We propose to integrate our measures
of trophic and chemical effects on lake processes using
similar models to those discussed in the Primary Production
Section above. In particular we will contrast annual
differences in top down control, as driven by fish,
and bottom up control, as driven by differences in the
quantity and quality of groundwater inputs.
C. RESPONSES TO DISTURBANCE AND STRESS
Perturbations affecting ecosystem processes operate
on a broad range of time scales. On one extreme, some
events, often termed disturbances (Pickett and White
1986), take place quickly but have effects that are
longer lasting. In contrast, the effects of other perturbations,
classified as stress, take place over an extended period.
Stress and disturbance can be considered as two ends
of a spectrum in which the time over which impact occurs
varies. Understanding the role of both slow- and fast-acting
perturbations is a fundamental goal in ecological studies
(Connell 1978, Bender et al. 1984, Pickett and
White 1986, Turner 1987). Our efforts at the NTL-LTER
site have emphasized slower-acting perturbations, particularly
acid deposition and species invasions. Our work on disturbance
has considered the role of turnover events as disturbances
in plankton communities and we are continuing these
efforts in conjunction with our work on chlorophyll
dynamics discussed above. Using a series of temporary
ponds at the NTL-LTER site, we also have tested explicitly
the hypothesis that the importance of biotic interactions
in determining community structure increases with the
extent of time between disturbance events.
1. Biological Invasions
Introduction. Lakes are island-like ecosystems
(Fig. 20), isolated to varying extents from adjacent
systems (Barbour and Brown 1974, Magnuson 1976). Natural
immigrations of aquatic organisms are rare events, particularly
where connections are limited among lakes. Such is the
case at our site where five of our seven primary lakes
are not connected by streams. Human-influenced species
introductions, however, are generally much more common.
To understand how species invasions affect lakes we
need to answer two basic questions: 1) What factors
control the probability of invasions into lakes? and
2) What are the effects of invasion on lake ecosystems?
The factors that control probability of the invasion
of a habitat by a new species are poorly understood
(Groves and Burdon 1986, Kornberg and Williamson 1986,
Mooney and Drake 1986), but several studies suggest
that perturbation leaves the ecosystem more vulnerable
to invasion (Fox and Fox 1986, Orians 1986, Lawton and
Brown 1986), through changes in resource availability
or reductions in native species. We expect that climate
change, a long-term perturbation, will affect the probability
of species invasions in our lakes (Mandrak 1989).
The establishment of non-native species may have wide
ranging effects (Simberloff 1981, Herbold and Moyle
1986, Moyle 1986, Vitousek 1986) . Such effects seem
to be particularly likely in aquatic habitats where
the substantial influence of trophic interactions is
well demonstrated (Carpenter and Kitchell 1988).
Results. While there have been many species
introductions within lakes at the NTL-LTER site over
the past 80 years, primarily through fishery manipulations,
three invading species stand out. Human activity has
led to dispersal in our region of two crayfish species
(Orconectes propinquus and O. rusticus)
and one fish species, the rainbow smelt (Osmerus
mordax). Of our primary study lakes, four have been
invaded by O. propinquus (the earliest invader),
two by O. rusticus, and two by smelt.
The effects of these invasions vary. We predicted
that the invasion of smelt into Sparkling Lake in 1982
would result in the local extinction of cisco (Coregonus
artedii), the native pelagic planktivore (Magnuson
and Beckel 1985). Although extinction has not yet occurred,
cisco are much less abundant and have suffered a near-total
recruitment failure since smelt became abundant in the
lake (Fig 21 top) (McLain and Magnuson 1988). In 1984
smelt invaded Crystal Lake, a small lake dominated by
perch. So far there has been no significant change in
perch abundance, and smelt have remained a small portion
of the pelagic catch (Fig 21 bottom).
For the crayfishes, we predicted that the two invading
species would become dominant sequentially, displacing
the native species Orconectes virilis (Capelli
1982, Capelli and Magnuson 1983, Lodge et al.
1986). Typically the first invader, O propinquus,
has not displaced the native species. In several of
our lakes both continue to coexist. O. rusticus,
which is more aggressive than the other species, overwhelmingly
dominates in Sparkling Lake. In Trout Lake it has spread
slowly, but where it is present it reaches abundances
far higher than those of the other species (Fig. 22,
p. 33). Experimental studies have shown that, at observed
population levels, O. rusticus has the potential
to exert a major influence over littoral zone communities
(Lodge and Lorman 1987); however its impact under natural
conditions remains to be demonstrated.
Proposed Research. We will continue to evaluate
the effects of invading species on our study lakes.
We also will focus on shifting patterns of invasion
frequency and effect as they respond to environmental
changes associated with climate.
How will climate associated changes in water levels
and thermal regimes influence patterns of colonization
and extinction? The rapid changes in climate anticipated
in the next half-century (Manabe and Stouffer 1980)
will likely cause a new set of stresses on the aquatic
ecosystems at the NTL LTER site. These may include drops
in water level both in our lakes and their associated
wetlands, as well as changes in flow regimes. Increased
temperatures are expected to alter thermal habitats,
especially in the littoral zone and surface waters,
where many organisms spend the larval life. Such additional
pressures on the native communities may increase the
probability of establishment of invading species and
the extinction of native taxa, thus increasing the severity
of the effects on the lakes.
We will approach this problem by using results from
the regional hydrology (p. 42), thermal structure (p.
11), and water quality models (p. 44), along with our
records of current species assemblages and habitat requirements
to predict changes in associations in the LTER lakes.
Ultimately we would like to generalize our findings
to the entire lake district.
How will the spread of rusty crayfish affect the
littoral zone communities in Trout Lake? We will
continue to monitor the natural experiment of crayfish
invasion and spread in Trout Lake. We have nearly annual
crayfish distribution data dating back to 1970 and macrophyte
and macroinvertebrate data starting in 1981. Collection
of these detailed data will continue. Because the rusty
crayfish has increased in abundance in the past few
years, we expect to see shifts in littoral zone communities
over the next several years.
What is the effect of macrophytes on their environment
and other biota. Vegetation can effect the physical,
chemical, and biological properties of the littoral
zone (Lodge et al. 1988, Lodge and Lorman 1987).
Consequentially the invading crayfish, O. rusticus
by eliminating the macrophytes, can alter in significant
ways the function of littoral communities. Obvious effects
include loss of cover for fishes and habitats for macroinvertebrates.
We will also examine the influence of the macrophytes
on the oxygenation of the rooting zone (Jaynes and Carpenter
1986) and the subsequent influence of that on the fauna.
A variety of differently vegetated habitats across the
range of lakes will be compared, including the deep-water,
poorly-illuminated submersed moss community below 10
m depth in Crystal Lake.
2. Acidic Deposition
Introduction. Acid deposition is an environmental
stress of internationally recognized importance (National
Academy of Sciences 1986, Altshuller and Lindhurst 1984).
Lakes at the NTL-LTER site receive substantial acid
loading (mean pH = 4.6 at the Trout Lake NADP Site)
and many are classified as sensitive to the effects
of acidification (Eilers et al. 1989, Watras
and Frost 1989). Our research on acid deposition has
focused on analysis of the role of groundwater buffering
in mitigating acidification effects (p. 15) and on a
whole-lake acidification experiment.
Results. The Little Rock Lake Experimental
Acidification Project (LRL) was established to identify
both the direct and indirect mechanisms by which increasing
acidity affects population, community and ecosystem
level conditions in lakes (Watras and Frost 1989). The
program is funded by US-EPA and involves investigators
from five institutions (Table 6). Little Rock Lake is
a secondary LTER study lake that lies within the same
groundwater system as our primary lakes. Sampling on
Little Rock has been designed to parallel LTER efforts
and there is close coordination between the two programs.
Following a baseline period, the two basins of Little
Rock Lake were separated with a watertight curtain in
fall 1984, and acid additions were begun to the north
basin at ice-out in spring 1985. Our experimental design
involves three, two-year acidification stages beginning
at the lakes original pH of 6.1 and progressing through
5.6, 5.1 and 4.6. Baseline data collected prior to acidification
indicated that the two lake basins were similar in physical,
chemical, and biological conditions. Results after acidification
indicated several distinct responses during the pH 5.6
stage (Table 7, p.
35) and an increased number at pH 5.1 (Table 8, p.
36). Data from the first year at pH 4.6 revealed in-lake
conditions that were fundamentally different than those
prior to acidification.
A key feature of the interplay between the LRL and
LTER projects has been the development of general techniques
for the evaluation of unreplicated, large-scale experiments.
Experiments of this scale have considerable advantages
(Schindler 1988) but they can only be interpreted against
a background of natural variability (Frost et al.
1988). Data collected on LTER lakes in parallel with
Little Rock Lake provide such critical information on
natural variability. We are developing techniques to
characterize this variability systematically (Kratz
et al. 1987, Frost and Kratz in preparation).
Much of this work has been conducted in collaboration
with S. Carpenter who has been involved in whole-ecosystem
manipulations on lakes nearby to our LTER site (e.g.,
Carpenter et al. 1989).
Proposed Research. Our efforts in this area
will involve continued work on the influence of groundwater
on lake acid-base conditions, the completion of the
acidification stage of Little Rock Lake, and the initiation
of a recovery experiment on Little Rock Lake (with non-LTER
funding).
D. SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VARIABILITY
Introduction. Traditionally, lake